ارزیابی صفات مربوط به عملکرد در هیبریدهای مولتی ژرم چغندرقند مقاوم به ریزومانیا

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 مؤسسه تحقیقات اصلاح و تهیه بذر چغندرقند، سازمان تحقیقات، آموزش و ترویج کشاورزی، کرج، ایران

2 استادیار، بخش تحقیقات چغندرقند، مرکز تحقیقات و آموزش کشاورزی و منابع طبیعی استان فارس، سازمان تحقیقات، آموزش و ترویج کشاورزی، زرقان، ایران

چکیده

بیماری ویروسی ریزومانیا یکی از مخرب‌ترین بیماری‌های چغندرقند در اکثر مناطق چغندرکاری دنیا محسوب می‌شود. با توجه به گستردگی این بیماری در برخی از استان‌های کشور، شناسایی هیبریدهای متحمل جدید و استفاده از آن‌ها به صورت تجاری امری ضروری است. در این تحقیق، از پنج گرده‌افشان حامل ژن Rz1 به عنوان والد پدری و سه سینگل‌کراس 276-3.27 × SB36، 276-37.34 × SB36 و I13 × A37.1 به عنوان پایه مادری برای تهیه هیبرید استفاده، هیبریدهای در سال 1389 تولید و در مزرعه آلوده به بیماری ریزومانیادر ایستگاه زرقان فارس ارزیابی مشاهده‌ای شدند. در سال‌های 1390 و 1391 پانزده هیبرید منتخب به همراه شاهدهای مقاوم و حساس به ریزومانیا در یک آزمایش در دو منظقه خراسان رضوی و کرج ارزیابی شدند. با توجه به نتایج تجزیه مرکب داده‌های دو منطقه مشهد و کرج در دو سال آزمایش مشخص شد که از نظر صفات عملکردی، هیبریدهای (I13 × A37.1) × S1-88239، (276-3.27 × SB36) × S1-88239 و (276-37.34 × SB36) × S1-88239 در مقایسه با شاهد مقاوم و هیبریدهای دیگر برتر بودند. بر اساس نتایج این تحقیق، همچین مییتوان والد S1-88239 را به عنوان گرده‌افشان مناسب برای تهیه رقم مقاوم به ریزومانیا توصیه کرد.

کلیدواژه‌ها


عنوان مقاله [English]

Evaluation of Yield Related Traits in Sugar Beet Multigerm Hybrids Resistant to Rhizomania Disease

نویسندگان [English]

  • S. Vahedi 1
  • H. Shahbazi 1
  • M. Bazrafshan 2
  • H. Noshad 1
  • P. Fasahat 1
1 respectively, Sugar Beet Seed Institute, Agricultural Research, Education and Extension Organization (AREEO), Karaj, Iran
2 Assistant Professor, Sugar beet Research Department, Fars Agricultural and Natural Resources Research and Education Center, AREEO, Zarghan, Iran.
چکیده [English]

Rhizomania disease is one of the most destructive diseases of sugar beet in most sugar beet planting areas throughout the world. The disease widespread in some provinces in Iran, necessitates the development of new resistant hybrids and their commercially usage. In this study, new hybrids were developed from a cross between five pollinators bearing Rz1 gene and three single-crosses (276-3.27×SB36, 276-37.34×SB36, and I13×A37.1) in 2010. Developed hybrids were evaluated in an infected field to rhizomania in Fars province. Later, hybrids together with resistant and susceptible controls were evaluated in two locations of Mashhad and Karaj in 2011 and 2012. Two-years experiment r esults showed that (I13×A37.1)×S1-88239, (276-3.27×SB36)×S1-88239, and (276-37.34×SB36)×S1-88239 hybrids had better response in terms of yield and qualitative traits compared to resistant control and other hybrids. Based on the results of this experiment, pollinator S1-88239 can be also recommended for the development of resistant cultivars to rhizomania in the target areas.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • sugar beet
  • Rhizomania
  • resistance evaluation
  • resistant hybrids
  • yield
Amiri, R., Moghaddam, M., Mesbah, M., Sadeghian, S. Y., Ghannadha, M. R., and Izadpanah, K. 2003. The inheritance of resistance to Beet necrotic yellow vein virus (BNYVV) in B. vulgaris sub sp. maritima, accession WB42: statistical comparisons with Holly-1-4. Euphytica 132: 363-373.
 
Anonymous 1987. The 1987 Montreal Protocol on Substances that deplete the ozone layer (as agreed in 1987). UNEP, Montreal, Canada. (http://ozone.unep.org/Ratification_status/montreal_protocol.shtml, ed.)
 
Asher, M. J. C. 1993. Rhizomania. pp. 311-346. In: Cooke, D. A., and Scott, R. K. (eds.) The Sugar Beet Crop, Science into Practice. Chapman and Hall, London, UK.
 
Asher, M. J. C., and Kerr, S. 1996. Rhizomania: Progress with resistant varieties. British Sugar Beet Review 64: 19-22.
 
Biancardi, E., Lewellen, R.T., DeBiaggi, M., Erichsen, A.W., and Stevanato, P. 2002. The origin of rhizomania resistance in sugar beet. Euphytica 127: 383-397.
 
Biancardi, E., and Tamada, T. 2016. Rhizomania, Springer, Heidelberg, Germany. 320 pp. Canova, A. 1959. On the pathology of sugar beet. Informative Fitopatology 9: 390-396.
 
Clark, M. F., and Adams, A. N. 1977. Characteristics of the microplate method of enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) for the detection of plant viruses. Journal of General Virology 34: 475-483.
 
Clover, G.R.G., Azam-Ali, S.N., Jaggard, K.W., and Smith, G. 1999. The effects of Beet yellows virus on the growth and physiology of sugar beet (Beta vulgaris). Plant Pathology 48: 129-138.
 
Draycott, A. P. 2006. Sugar Beet. Blackwell Publishing, Ltd, Oxford, UK.
 
Farshadfar, E. 1998. Application of Quantitative Genetics in Plant Breeding. Razi University Press, Kermanshah, Iran, 726 pp. (in Persian).
 
Harveson, R., and Rush, C. M. 2002. The influence of irrigation frequency and cultivar blends on the severity of multiple root diseases in sugar beets. Plant Disease 86: 901-908.
 
Johansson, E. 1985. Rhizomania in sugar beet – a threat to beet growing that can be overcome by plant breeding. Sveriges Utsädesförenings Tidskrift 95: 115-121.
 
Johnson, K. B. 1991. Methods for measurement of crop losses caused by soilborne fungal pathogens, pp. 236-242. In: Curl., E., Johnson, L., and Rush., C. (eds.) Methods for Research on Soilborne Phytopathogenic Fungi. American Phytopathological Society, St. Paul, Minnesota, USA.
 
Liu, H. Y., Sears, J. L., and Lewellen, R. T. 2005. Occurrence of resistance-breaking Beet necrotic yellow vein virus of sugarbeet. Plant Disease 89: 464-468.
 
Luterbacher, M. C., Asher, M. J. C., Beyer, W., Mandolino, G., Scholten, O. E., Frese, L., Biancardi, E., Stevanato, P., Mechelke, W., and Slyvchenko, O. 2005. Sources of resistance to diseases of sugar beet in related Beta germplasm: soil borne diseases. Euphytica 141: 49-63.
 
Norouzi, P., Mahmoudi, S. B., Aghaeezadeh, M., Kakoueinejad, M., Orazizadeh, M. R., Vahedi, S., and Fathi, M. R. 2010. Repitability of a molecular marker linked with rhizomania resistance gene in sugar beet. Journal of Crop Breeding 8: 30-42 (in Persian).
 
Pferdmenges, F., and Varrelmann, M. 2009. Breaking of Beet necrotic yellow vein virus resistance in sugar beet is independent of virus and vector inoculum densities. European Journal of Plant Pathology 124: 231-245.
 
Putz, C., Merdinoglu, D., Lemaire, O., Stocky, G., Valentin, P., and Wiedemann, S. 1990. Beet necrotic yellow veine virus, causal agent of sugar beet rhizomania. Disease profile. Review of Plant Pathology 69: 247-253.
 
Radivojevic, S. D. J., Dosenovic, I. S., Kabic, D. R., Gyura, J. F., Rozic, R. B., and Sabados, V. V. 2006. Variation in the yield of root, sugar and the quality of sugar beet depending on variety and soil infestation with rhizomania. Proceedings for Natural Sciences / Matica Srpska Matica Srpska (Novi Sad, Serbia) 110: 91-102.
 
Rezaei, J., Bannayan, M., Nezami, A., Mehrvar, M., and Mahmoodi, S. B. 2014. Growth analysis of rhizomania infected and healthy sugar beet. Journal of Crop Science and Biotechnology 17: 59-69.
 
Rush, C. M., Liu, H. Y., Lewellen, R. T., and Acosta-Leal, R. 2006. The continuing saga of rhizomania of sugar beets in the United State. Plant Disease 90: 4-15.
 
Salarian, A., Amini Dehaghi, M., and Ahmadi, J. 2011. The quantitative and qualitative properties of some resistant cultivars of sugar beet (Beta vulgaris L.) to Rhizomania disease. Journal of Agronomy Sciences 5: 63-72.
 
Tamada, T., and Baba, T. 1973. Beet necrotic yellow vein virus from rhizomania-affected sugar beet in Japan. Annals of the Phytopathological Society of Japan 39: 325-332.
 
Tuitert, G., Musters-van Oorschot, P.M.S., and Hiejbroek, W. 1994. Effect of sugar beet cultivars with different levels of resistance to Beet necrotic yellow vein virus on transmission of virus by Polymyxa betae. European Journal of Plant Pathology 100: 201-220.