ارزیابی ژنوتیپ‌های امیدبخش کُنار (.Ziziphus mauritiana Lamk) در باهوکلات در استان سیستان و بلوچستان

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسنده

استادیار، بخش تحقیقات علوم زراعی و باغی، مرکز تحقیقات و آموزش کشاورزی و منابع طبیعی بلوچستان، سازمان تحقیقات، آموزش و ترویج کشاورزی، ایرانشهر، ایران.

10.22092/spj.2026.374233.1482

چکیده

با توجه به وجود شرایط مطلوب برای تولید محصول کُنار به صورت اقتصادی در جنوب استان سیستان و بلوچستان، انجام پژوهش‌هایی در خصوص بررسی سازگاری و مقایسه عملکرد و خصوصیات کمی و کیفیت میوه ژنوتیپ ­های موجود کُنار در منطقه، ضروری بود تا ژنوتیپ(های) مناسب و برتر برای توسعه و رونق این محصول، شناسایی شود. ژنوتیپ‎‌های کُنار مورد ارزیابی شامل B1001، B1002، B1003، B1004، B1005 و B1006 بودند که در قالب طرح بلوک‌های کامل تصادفی با چهار تکرار در ایستگاه تحقیقات میوه‌های گرمسیری باهوکلات شهرستان چابهار در دو سال 1395 و 1396 ارزیابی شدند. منشاء این شش ژنوتیپ از گونه کُنار هندی (Z. mauritiana) بود که از شهرستان راسک جمع آوری شده بودند. این ژنوتیپ­ها بر روی پایه درخت کُنار محلی متعلق به گونه Z. spina-christi پیوند شدند. نتایج نشان داد که ژنوتیپ‌های B1003 و B1004 به ترتیب با میانگین 120/64و 117/62کیلوگرم در هر درخت، بیشترین عملکرد میوه را داشتند. همچنین این دو ژنوتیپ‌ از بیشترین وزن میوه در میان سایر ژنوتیپ‌ها برخوردار بودند. ژنوتیپ B1002 با عملکرد میوه 101/2کیلوگرم در درخت، بیشترین طول میوه (4/58سانتی‌متر) را داشت. میوه ژنوتیپ‌های B1005 و  B1002مخروطی شکل و کشیده بود، درحالی‌که میوه ژنوتیپ‌های B1003 و B1004 تقریباً گرد و کروی و میوه ژنوتیپ‌های  B1001و B1006 گرد تا تخم‌مرغی شکل بودند. ژنوتیپ B1001 بیشترین میزان مواد جامد محلول (14درصد) را دارا بود، در حالی‌که ژنوتیپ B1005 بالاترین نسبت مواد جامد محلول به اسیدیته (41/1) را داشت. ژنوتیپ B1004 دارای بیشترین میزان ویتامین ث (406/9میلی‌گرم در 100 گرم گوشت) بود. بر اساس یافته­ های این پژوهش و با در نظر گرفتن میزان عملکرد میوه و کیفیت میوه کشت ژنوتیپ  B1003برای کشت در مناطق جنوب بلوچستان و مناطق گرم و مرطوب مشابه سایر استان‌های جنوبی کشور توصیه می‌شود.

کلیدواژه‌ها


عنوان مقاله [English]

Evluation of Promising Ber (Ziziphus mauritiana Lamk.) Genotypes in Bahoukalat in Sistan and Baluchestan Province in Iran

نویسنده [English]

  • E. Saboki
Assistant Professor, Filed and Horticultural Crops Science Research Department, Baluchestan, Agricultural and Natural Resources Research and Education Center, Agricultural Research, Education and Extension Organization (AREEO), Iranshahr, Iran.
چکیده [English]

The economic potential of ber production in southern part of Baluchestan in Iran necessitates investigations on the adaptability, performance, and quantitative and quality fruit characteristics of available ber genotypes to identify the superior genotype(s) for the development of this crop in the target areas. In the present study, six promising ber genotypes (B1001, B1002, B1003, B1004, B1005, and B1006) were evaluated using randomized complete block design with four replications in Bahukalat Tropical Fruit Research Station in Chabahar County, Iran, in 2016 and 2017. All six genotypes belong to Indian ber species (Ziziphus mauritiana) and were collected from Rask county in Sistan and Baluchestan province. Genotypes B1003 (120.64 kg tree-1) and B1004 (117.62 kg tree-1) produced the highest fruit yield, respectively. These two genotypes also had the highest fruit weights, respectively, and their fruit shapes were approximately round to spherical. Genotype B1004 had the highest vitamin C content. Based on the findings of this study, genotype B1003, considering its high fruit yield and desirable fruit quality, can be recommended for cultivation in southern Balochestan and other similar warm and humid regions of the southern provinces in Iran.
 
Keywords: Ber, morphological trait, fruit yield, fruit quality, total soluble solids.
 
 
Introduction
Ber (Ziziphus mauritiana Lam.), a member of the family Rhamnaceae, is widely distributed across diverse geographical and climatic conditions, resulting in considerable genetic and phenotypic diversity (Pareek and Sharma, 1991). Previous studies have demonstrated substantial variation among ber genotypes in fruit size, shape, yield, and physicochemical and nutritional characteristics, indicating considerable potential for selecting superior genotypes (Mirheidari et al., 2022; Kumar et al., 2024b). However, genotype performance may vary with environmental conditions, and genotypes that perform well in one region may not necessarily exhibit similar performance elsewhere.
 In southern Iran, particularly in southern Balochestan, ber production is constrained by the predominance of small-fruited local genotypes, limited water availability, and insufficient access to improved germplasm. Although the region has considerable potential for ber cultivation, comparative information on the fruit morphological, fruit yield-related and fruit-quality characteristics of locally available genotypes remains limited. Therefore, identifying genotypes that combine desirable yield and fruit-quality attributes with adaptation to regional conditions is important for future cultivation and breeding programs.
The present study aimed to evaluate six ber genotypes using fruit morphological, fruit yield-related, and fruit quality characteristics under the environmental conditions of southern Balochestan and to identify superior suitable for cultivation in target areas.
 
Materials and Methods
This study was carried out to evaluate and quantitfy fruit morphological, yield-related, and quality traits of six promising ber genotypes of (Ziziphus mauritiana); B1001, B1002, B1003, B1004, B1005, and B1006, using randomized complete block design with four replications in Bahukalat Tropical Fruit Research Station in Chabahar county, Iran, in 2016 and 2017. Each replication consisted of three trees of each genotype planted at of 6 × 6 meters spacing arrangement.
The mean values of the three trees were used for statistical analysis. The vegetative phase of the research project was conducted from 2006 to 2011. To allow all trees to reach full bearing stage. The second phase of the research project was initiated after five-year intervals to evaluate reproductive traits, including fruit quantitative, yield-related, and fruit quality characteristics.
The evaluated fruit traits included fruit weight, fruit length, fruit diameter, fruit shape, stone weight, stone length and diameter, pulp percentage, total soluble solids (TSS), total acidity (TA), the TSS: TA ratio, vitamin C content, fruit moisture content, and ash content. The collected data were analyzed using SAS software, and mean comparisons were performed using Duncan’s multiple range test at the 1% probability level.
 
Results and Discussion
The highest yields were recorded in genotypes B1003 (120.64 kg tree-1) and B1004 (117.64 kg tree-1), respectively. Significant differences in fruit weight were observed among the evaluated ber genotypes. Genotype B1003 had the highest fruit weight (29.0 g), followed by B1004 (28.1 g). Genotype B1005 had the highest fruit moisture content (87.4%), which was statistically comparable to that of B1002 (86.42%) and B1003 (86.24%). Variation in fruit yield-related traits have also been reported by Kumar et al. (2024b).
 Genotype B1001 had the highest TSS content and the lowest moisture content, whereas B1005, which had the highest moisture content, had the lowest TSS content. Pulp percentage exceeded 90% in all evaluated ber genotypes, the genotype B1002 had the lowest stone weight (0.74 g). Genotype B1006 had the highest total acidity, however vitamin C content ranged from 223 mg 100 g⁻¹ in B1001 to 406.9 mg 100 g⁻¹ in B1004. Singh and Misra (2011) also reported differences for quality traits in ber (Zizyphus mauritiana Lamk.) genotypes
Fruit weight was strongly and significantly and positively correlated with fruit yield (r = 0.86), fruit diameter (r = 0.98), stone weight (r = 0.88) and pulp percentage (r = 0.62). In contrast, fruit weight was significantly and negatively correlated with the fruit shape index (fruit length: diameter ratio) (r = -0.86).
The results of the present study revealed considerable variation among the six promising ber genotypes for fruit morphological, fruit yield, fruit quality traits. This variation indicates differences in the genetic potential of the studied ber genotypes and their responses to the environmental conditions of the region. Kumar et al. (2024b) have also reported similar diversity in fruit characteristics of ber (Zizyphus mauritiana Lamk.) genotypes.
 
References
Kumar, S., Sharma, J.R., Kumar, M., Singh, N. and Kumar, N. 2024b. Evaluation of ber genotypes grown under semi-arid conditions. Indian Journal of Horticulture, 81(4), pp.349-355. DOI: 10.58993/ijh/2024.81.4.4
Mirheidari, F., Khadivi, A., Saeidifar, A. and Moradi, Y. 2022. Selection of superior genotypes of Indian jujube (Ziziphus mauritiana Lamk.) as revealed by fruit-related traits. Food Science & Nutrition, 10(3), pp.903-913. DOI: 10.1002/fsn3.2721
Pareek, O.P. and Sharma S. 1991. Fruit trees for arid and semi-arid lands. Indian Farming, 41, pp. 25-33.
Singh, R. and Misra, K.K. 2011. Studies on physico-chemical characters of fruits of ber (Zizyphus mauritiana Lamk.) genotypes. Progressive Horticulture, 43(2), pp.248-251.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Ber
  • morphological trait
  • fruit yield
  • fruit quality
  • total soluble solids
Abdel-Sattar, M., Almutairi, K.F., Al-Saif, A.M. and Ahmed, K.A.M. 2021. Fruit properties during the harvest period of eleven Indian jujube (Ziziphus mauritiana Lamk.) cultivars. Saudi Journal of Biological Sciences, 28, pp.3424-3432. DOI: 10.1016/j.sjbs.2021.03.006
 
 
 
Abdel-Sattar, M., Al-Obeed, R.S., Rihan, H.Z. and El-Badan, G.E. 2024. Genetic diversity and relationships among Indian jujube (Ziziphus mauritiana Lamk.) cultivars using morphometric characteristics, matK barcoding, and ISSR markers. Diversity, 16, pp.313. DOI: 10.3390/d16060313
 
 
Aldhanhani, A.R., Ahmed, Z.F., Tzortzakis, N. and Singh, Z. 2022. Maturity stage at harvest influences antioxidant phytochemicals and antibacterial activity of jujube fruit (Ziziphus mauritiana Lamk. and Ziziphus spina-christi L.). Annals of Agricultural Sciences, 67, pp.196-203.  DOI: 10.1016/j.aoas.2022.12.003
 
 
Anonymous. 2024. Statistical Year Book of Agricultural Crops. Report on Horticultural, Mushroom and Greenhouse Crops. Ministry of Jihad-e-Agriculture, Tehran, Iran. 359 pp. (in Persian). 
 
 
Chen, K., Fan, D., Fu, B., Zhou, J. and Li, H. 2018. Comparison of physical and chemical composition of three Chinese jujube (Ziziphus jujuba Mill.) cultivars cultivated in four districts of Xinjiang region in China. Food Science and Technology, 39(4), pp.912-921. DOI: 10.1590/fst.11118
 
 
Das, U., Hugar, A. and Kurubar, A.R. 2022a. Evaluation of different ber (Ziziphus mauritiana L.) cultivars for yield and morphological attributes. Karnataka Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 56(1), pp.381-388.
 
 
Das, U., Hugar, A., Das, S., Das, S.S. and Kurubar, A.R. 2022b. Genetic diversity of ber (Ziziphus mauritiana L.) cultivars using physico-chemical characteristics. Israel Journal of Plant Sciences, 69(3-4), pp.172-180. DOI: 10.1163/22238980-bja10059
 
 
Ghose, G.H., Rahman, S.M.L. and Hossain, A.K.M.A. 2007. Fruit characteristics of commercially popular ber varieties of Bangladesh. Pakistan Journal of Agricultural Research, 20, pp.40-43.
 
 
Gupta, N. 2018. Morphological and physico-chemical characterization of ber (Ziziphus mauritiana Lamk.) genotypes in semi-arid zone of Punjab. International Journal of Chemical Studies, 6(5), pp.2353-2356.
 
 
Islam, M.N., Molla, M.M., Nasrin, T.A.A., Uddin, A.S.M.M. and Kobra, K. 2015. Determination of maturity indices of ber (Zizyphus mauritiana Lam.) var. BARI Kul-2. Bangladesh Journal of Agricultural Research, 40(1), pp.163-176. DOI: 10.3329/bjar.v40i1.23769
 
 
Khadivi, A. 2023. Morphological characterization and interspecific variation among five species of Ziziphus genus to select superiors in Iran. BMC Plant Biology, 23(1), p.550. DOI: 10.1186/s12870-023-04566-4
 
 
Koley, T.K., Kaur, C., Nagal, S., Walia, S., Jaggi, S., and Sarika, J. 2016. Antioxidant activity and phenolic content in genotypes of Indian jujube (Zizyphus mauritiana Lamk.). Arabian Journal of Chemistry, 9, pp. S1044-S1052. DOI: 10.1016/j.arabjc.2011.11.005
 
 
Kumar, S., Sharma, J.R., Kumar, M., Bishnoi, M. and Gavri, A. 2024a. Evaluation of ber (Ziziphus mauritiana) genotypes under semi-arid region of Haryana. The Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 94(8), pp.881-889. DOI: 10.56093/ijas.v94i8.147830
 
 
Kumar, S., Sharma, J.R., Kumar, M., Singh, N. and Kumar, N. 2024b. Evaluation of ber genotypes grown under semi-arid conditions. Indian Journal of Horticulture, 81(4), pp.349-355. DOI: 10.58993/ijh/2024.81.4.4
 
 
Kumari, S., Bhat, D.J., Wali, V.K., Bakshi, P. and Jasrotia, A. 2015. Physico-chemical studies of different ber (Zizyphus mauritiana Lamk.) germplasm under rainfed conditions of Jammu. The Bioscan, 10(3), pp.1427-1430.
 
 
Meena, S., Bhardwaj, R.L., Pushpa, K., Kumar, L., Poonia, S. and Kuri, R. 2023a. Effect of nano nitrogen and phosphorus on growth, yield and quality of ber, Ziziphus mauritiana Lam. Journal of Agriculture and Ecology, 17, pp.49-52.  DOI: 10.58628/JAE-2317-308
 
 
Meena, V.S., Singh, K., Shekhawat, N., Bhardwaj, R., Lal, H., Rani, K. and Kumar, P. 2023b. Assessment of genetic variability for fruit nutritional composition in the ex-situ collection of Jujube (Ziziphus spp.) genotypes of arid regions of India. Horticulturae, 9(2), p.210. DOI: 10.3390/horticulturae9020210
 
 
Mirheidari, F., Khadivi, A., Saeidifar, A. and Moradi, Y. 2022. Selection of superior genotypes of Indian jujube (Ziziphus mauritiana Lamk.) as revealed by fruit-related traits. Food Science & Nutrition, 10(3), pp.903-913. DOI: 10.1002/fsn3.2721
 
 
Norouzi, E., Erfani-Moghadam, J., Fazeli, A. and Khadivi, A. 2017. Morphological variability within and among three species of Ziziphus genus using multivariate analysis. Scientia Horticulturae, 222, pp.180-186. DOI: 10.1016/j.scienta.2017.05.016
 
 
Obeed, R.S., Harhash, M.M. and Abdel-Mawgood, A.L. 2008. Fruit properties and genetic diversity of five ber (Ziziphus mauritiana Lamk.) cultivars. Pakistan Journal of Biological Sciences, 11(6), pp.888-893. DOI: 10.3923/pjbs.2008.888.893
 
 
Omar, A.K., Al-Obeed, R.S., Al-Saif, A.M. and Soliman, S. 2015. The impact of foliar application of urea, zinc and Canada Humex on yield and fruit properties of jujube “CV Puyin” under Saudi Arabia conditions. Journal of Agriculture and Natural Resources Sciences, 2(3), pp.524-529.
 
 
Pareek, O.P. and Sharma S. 1991. Fruit trees for arid and semi-arid lands. Indian Farming, 41, pp. 25-33.
 
 
Pareek, S., Kitinoja, L., Kaushik, R.A. and Paliwal, R. 2009. Postharvest physiology and storage of ber. Stewart Postharvest Review, 5(5), pp.1-10.  DOI: 10.2212/spr.2009.5.5
 
 
Shahrajabian, M.H., Khoshkharam, M., Zandi, P., Sun, W. and Cheng, Q. 2019. Jujube, a super-fruit in traditional Chinese medicine, heading for modern pharmacological science. Journal of Medicinal Plants Studies, 7(4), pp.173-178.
 
 
Sharif, N., Jaskani, M.J., Naqvi, S.A. and Awan, F.S. 2019. Exploitation of diversity in domesticated and wild ber (Ziziphus mauritiana Lam.) germplasm for conservation and breeding in Pakistan. Scientia Horticulturae, 249, pp.228-239. DOI: 10.1016/j.scienta.2019.01.041
 
 
Singh, R. and Misra, K.K. 2011. Studies on physico-chemical characters of fruits of ber (Zizyphus mauritiana Lamk.) genotypes. Progressive Horticulture, 43(2), pp.248-251.
 
 
Sudarsan, S.M. and Maran, J.P. 2020. A study on apple ber to identify the suitability of new product development. Plant Science Today, 7(1), pp.61-69. DOI: 10.14719/pst.2020.7.1.640
 
 
Tarai, R.K. and Ghosh, S.N. 2010. Varietal evaluation for yield and yield parameters of ber under semi-arid region of West Bengal. Journal of Horticultural Sciences, 5(1), pp.17-20. DOI: 10.24154/jhs.v5i1.485
 
 
Yan, M., Wang, Y., Watharkar, R.B., Pu, Y., Wu, C., Lin, M. and Xia, Y. 2022. Physicochemical and antioxidant activity of fruit harvested from eight jujube (Ziziphus jujuba Mill.) cultivars at different development stages. Scientific Reports, 12(1), p.2272. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-022-06313-5
 
 
Zandiehvakili, G. and Khadivi, A. 2021. Identification of the promising Ziziphus spina‐christi (L.) Willd. genotypes using pomological and chemical proprieties. Food Science and Nutrition, 9(10), 5698-5711. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/fsn3.2535