تاثیر تنش خشکی بر اثر ژن و قابلیت ترکیب لاین‌های ذرت دانه‌ای

نویسندگان

1 مرکز تحقیقات کشاورزی و منابع طبیعی استان اردبیل

2 مؤسسه تحقیقات اصلاح و تهیه نهال و بذر، کرج

چکیده

در این بررسی، 36 ترکیب حاصل از تلاقی دو تستر K3653/2 (متحمل به خشکی) و K3615/1 (حساس به خشکی)) با 18 لاین براساس مدل لاین× تستر، در دو شرایط آبیاری کامل و شرایط قطع آبیاری در دوره پر شدن دانه در دو آزمایش جدا در قالب طرح بلوک‌های کامل تصادفی با سه تکرار به مدت دو سال در ایستگاه تحقیقاتی مغان مورد مقایسه قرار گرفتند. نتایج برآورد اثر ژن‌ها با تجزیه لاین × تستر نشان داد هر دو اثر افزایشی و غالبیت در کنترل عملکرد دانه و اکثر صفات زراعی نقش داشتند. برآورد نسبت ترکیب‌پذیری عمومی به خصوصی نشان داد نقش واریانس غالبیت در کنترل عملکرد دانه مهم‌تر است. تخمین ترکیب پذیری لاین‌ها و تسترها به منظور شناسایی ترکیب شونده مطلوب و مفید در هر دو شرایط آبیاری کامل و تنش خشکی نشان داد که لاین‌ها و تسترها برای عملکرد دانه، ترکیب‌پذیری عمومی معنی‌دار و متفاوتی داشتند. در دو شرایط مختلف روند چندان مشابهی در ترکیب‌پذیری لاین‌ها مشاهده نشد. لاین‌های L8، L11 و L17 در شرایط آبیاری نرمال و لاین‌های L1، L16 و L17 در شرایط قطع آب در مرحله پرشدن دانه، از نظر عملکرد ترکیب‌پذیری عمومی مثبت معنی‌دار و بهتری داشتند. تستر K3653/2 در شرایط نرمال و تنش خشکی ترکیب‌پذیری عمومی مثبت و معنی‌دار داشت. تلاقی‌های L1×T1، L4×T1 و L8×T1 در شرایط نرمال و تلاقی L9×T2 در شرایط تنش از نظر عملکرد ترکیب‌پذیری خصوصی مثبت معنی‌دار داشتند.

کلیدواژه‌ها


عنوان مقاله [English]

Drought Stress Effects on Gene Action and Combining Ability of Maize Inbred Lines

نویسندگان [English]

  • R. Choukan 2
  • R. T. Aliyev
چکیده [English]

This study was carried out to investigate the genetic structure of the 36 maize hybrids established from eighteen female lines and two male testers according to line × tester method under normal irrigation and drought stress conditions. Two separate experiments, normal irrigation and drought stress at grain filling stage were performed in Moghan for two years, using a RBCD with three replications. The results showed that the effect of gene action could be both non-additive and additive in the expression of grain yield under both conditions. However, GCA/SCA variance ratio revealed that non-additive genetic variance was more important for grain yield than additive variance. Analysis of general combining ability indicated that the variation of combining ability of lines in non-water stress condition was higher than that in water stress condition. The reactions of general combining ability of lines in both conditions were not similar. Lines L8, L11 and L17 in normal irrigation and lines L15, L16 and L17 in stress condition showed better general combining abilities for grain yield. The K3653/2 tester showed better general combining abilities for grain yield in both conditions. The crosses such as L1×T1, L4×T1 and L8×T1 in normal irrigation condition and L9×T2 in drought stress condition showed better specific combining abilities for grain yield.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Maize general and specific combining ability
  • Hybrid
  • Water stress
  • additive effects
  • dominant effects
References Anees, A., and Muhammad, S. 2003. Combining ability analysis in Zea mays L. International Journal of Agricultural Biology 5: 239-244.
 
Aulicino, M. B., and Naranjo, C. A. 2001. Evaluation of combining ability of inbred maize lines for precocity and yield. Maize Genetics Cooperation Newsletter 71: 53-54.
 
Basal, H., and Turgut, I. 2005. Genetic analysis of yield components and fiber strength in upland cotton (G. hirsutum L). Asian Journal of Plant Science 4: 293-298.
 
Betran, F. J., Beck, D., Banziger, M., and Edmeades, G. O. 2003. Genetic analysis of inbred and hybrid grain yield under stress and non stress environments in tropical maize. Corp Science 43: 807-817.
 
Choukan, R. 1999. Estimation of combining ability, additive and dominance variance in corn lines using line × tester cross. Seed and Plant 15: 65-73 (in Persian).
 
Choukan, R., 2008. Methods of Genetical Analysis of Quantitative Traits in Plant Breeding. 1st edition. Agricultural research, Education and Extension Organization, Tehran, Iran. 270 pp. (in Persian).
 
Cosmin, O., Bica, N., and Bagiu, C. 1991. Study of combining ability in some inbred lines of maize. Problem de Genetical Aplicata 23 (3-4): 463-493.
 
Esmaili, A., Dehgani, H., Khavari-Khorasani, S., and Mirzaee, N. H. 2005. Estimation of combining ability and gene effects of early mature corn inbred lines at different plant densities by line × tester analysis. Iranian Journal of Agricultural Sciences 5: 917-929 (in Persian).
 
Guie, R. G., and Wassom, C. E. 1992. Inheritance of some drought adaptive traits in maize: 1. Interrelationships between yield, flowering, and ears per plant. Maydica 37: 157-164.
 
Hallauer, A. R., and Miranda, F.G.B. 1981. Quantitative Genetics in Maize Breeding. Iowa State University Press, Ames, Iowa, USA. 468 pp.
 
Hefny, M. M. 2007. Estimation of quantitative genetic parameters for nitrogen use efficiency in maize under two nitrogen rates. International Journal of Plant Breeding and Genetics 1: 54-66.
 
Hosseini, S. F., Choukan, R., Bihamta, M. R., and Mohammadi, A. 2013. Estimation of combining ability and gene effect in maize lines using line×tester under drought stress conditions. Iranian Journal of Crop Sciences 15(1): 60-70 (in Persian).
 
Iqbal, A. M. , Nehvi, F. A. , Wani, S. A., Rehana, Q., and Zahoor, A.D. 2007. Combining ability analysis for yield and yield related traits in maize (Zea mays L.). International Journal of Plant Breeding and Genetics 1: 101-105.
 
Kempthorne, O. 1957. An Introduction to Genetic Statistics. 1st edition., John Wiley and Sons, New York, USA. 545 pp.
 
Konak, C., Unay, A., Serter, E., and Basal, H. 1999. Estimation of combining ability effects, hetrosis and heterobeltiosis by line×tester method in maize. Turkish Journal of Field Crops 4: 1-9.
 
Kumar, M.N.V., Kumar, S.S., and Ganeh, M. 1999. Combining ability studies for oil improvement in maize ( Zea mays L.). Crop Research Hissar 18: 93-99.
 
Lee Ho, S., and Shung Lu, H. 1995. Identification of heterotic patterns with inbred line testers in maize. Journal of Agricultural Research China 44: 242-250.
 
Malvar, R. A., Ordás, A., Revilla, P., and Cartea M. E., 1996. Estimates of genetic variances in two Spanish populations of maize. Crop Science 36 (2 ): 291-295.
 
Mendoza, M., Oyervides, A., and Lopez, A. 2000. New maize cultivars with agronomic potential for the humid tropics. Agronomia Meso Americana 11: 83-88.
 
Nestares, G., Frutos, E., and Eyherabide, G. 1999. Combining ability evaluation in organic flint lines of maize. Pesquisa Agropecua Yia Brasileria 34: 1399-1406.
 
Ngaboyisonga, C., Njoroge, K., Kirubi, D., and Githiri, S. M. 2009. Effects of low nitrogen and drought on genetic parameters of grain yield and endosperm hardness of quality protein maize. Asian Journal of Agricultural Research 3: 1-10.
 
Porra, R.J., Thompson W.A., and Kriedemann, P.E. 1989. Determination of accurate extinction coefficients and simultaneous equations for assaying chlorophyll a and b extracted with four different solvents: verification of the concentration of chlorophyll standards by atomic absorption spectroscopy. Biochim Biophys Acta 975: 384-394.
 
Shiri, M. 2013a. Drought stress effects on combining ability of lines and genetic properties of hybrids in maize (Zea mays L. ). Ph.D. Thesis, Azerbaijan National Academy of Sciences, Genetic Resources Institute, Baku, Azerbaijan. 201pp.
 
Shiri, M. 2013b. Grain yield stability analysis of maize (Zea mays L.) hybrids in different drought stress conditions using GGE biplot analysis. Crop Breeding Journal 3(2): 107-112.
 
Singh, D. N., and Singh, I. S. 1998. Line × tester analysis in maize (Zea mays L.). Journal of Research Birsa Agriculture University 10: 177-182.
 
Spaner, D., Brathwait, R. A. I., and Mather, D. E. 1996. Diallel study of open- pollinated maize varieties in Trinidad. Euphytica 90: 65-72.
 
Wolf, D. P., Peternelli, L. A., Hallauer, A. R. 2000. Estimates of genetic variance in an F2 maize population. The American Genetic Association 91: 384-391.